PASS - PRESENT - FUTURE
CHAPTER THIRD
|
Every document of this site, as original object of author, is protected by the law of March 11, 1957 relative to the copies of documents. In consequences, " all representation or complete, or partial reproduction, made without the author's consent (Richard Natter) or of his having right or having reason, is illicit ". |
" RENDEZ - YOU DEMAIN "
* * * * * * * * * *
You are always là ? It is sympathique ! Who does Y'en have make me the muzzle again? It is a pity. Reread the first two chapters attentively, without trying to read between the lines. Don't try to make me tell that that I didn't judge good to write. Even less to make pass me for the one that I am not. To say the things with firmness, and virility sometimes I recognize it, it is not show evidence of aggressiveness. Who likes well castigates well, I refer some to this adage to justify the bitterness and the causticity of my subjects. Yes, I like life, I like people, I like my pays ! It is solely by love, that I decided to create this history; this Test more precisely. I didn't invent anything, nothing hidden, nothing exaggerated. All as with my poetic writing, I relate life as feel it. A philosopher told me in a friendly way one day, at the end of a recital of poetry, that I was to hits eyes : "a witness of my time " ! Doesn't a witness have to testify ?
The other, always and again! What it can bring us, to offer us or to valorize us, one doesn't care about it as our first shirt. Shut in in the silence of our muteness, we deplore everything that constitutes the exactions. Without blushing not to make anything to dam up their stream.
Then, before trying to knock me down, rather try to understand my message ? Don't read anymore in my testimony, what you want to shout without daring to make it.
If the exploitation lasts, why consider not being joined to computers during our sleep? A franc times it for the dreams in black and white!& Five francs for those in color!& In return for monthly forfeits, we would have nevertheless right to reductions! To very sensible condition, not to make the same dreams in succession two times!
How will live ourselves from the year two mille ? Will we be going to picnic on the Moon, March or Jupiter ? Will we continue to walk in the droppings of dogs, and to take those of the pigeons on the head ? Will the ripoux always be as rot ? Bof ! ... Nothing interesting in truth !
I don't say that it is not necessary to have projects far from there. An ideal, an objective, it is very important. Somewhere, it is probably a motor element for the future. To condition however of himself of it to hold ! To set a goal and all to put in work to arrive there, while perpetually getting lost in various directions, is only an illusion.
The ambition, will, courage, the patience, is virtues in way of disappearance. We lose our reference marks, we adulate the past to the detriment of the present, and we hope to find by the "seers , the answers to our questions. It is not the best formula.
To moan in its beard, to show its anger in silence or on the contrary, to let explode her between the hands of manipulators, not being the best way to make advance the ship.
The honesty is nowadays so a commodity rare, that it is practically impossible to adhere to an offer as appetizing either it, without dreading the worse immediately.
My first proposition , it is to the most elevated level of the social echelon, to know the bankers. I speak solely of power and no of value.
Rather than to persecute the people who become insoluble by the strength of the things, or who drag in their falls of the thousands of individuals, why erase not " the debts merely? Lost for lost, money it is certain won't go back anymore in the cases of the bankers. When did one rob everything, stolen, and wrecked after a seizure, that remains il ?
For it, it would agree to burn all files of debts and credits concerning the small that are in situation of more power to pay. In the same way for the small and middle enterprises. Not only to the level of the bankers, but also opposite the state and the services " pompeurs of fric" : taxes, retirements, social security etc..
Rather than to persist, judicial procedures in head, to bury a human being more, why not to grant him the extenuating circumstances and to help it to forget its erreur ? Certainly, a previous survey of the files would be required. That it is for the entrepreneur or the individual, every case should be studied and examined to the gnarl.
One can go again farther in the desire of rééquilibrer a Nation. The dirty money, the schemes, the undersides of table, one will never prevent them. The corruption doesn't go overnight, to lower intensity nor to lessen. What it would be discriminating to re-establish, it is a more honorable feeling of fairness.
An association " France Aid ", in every department, could assume the role of private bank extensively. Ready to the individuals who would pour their wages well sûr ; helps to the enterprises in difficulté ; help of emergency to the families in distress.
I like my country. I know that it has the means to recover its strength and its nobility. That one starts with valorizing those and those that are able to bring him the knowledge, before destroying them because of this cursed to can. The technologies, the knowledge to make, are recognized unanimously through the monde ; safe by the silly naturally. A last time to conclude this first proposition, the money of the debts of which would be relieved those and those that would be recognized some worthy, is condemned of all way! To harass more that of reason, to intimidate one way or another, pressure or blackmail don't serve to anything. When one touches the bottom, one collapses of it. Are goods seized once, that can prick the bailiffs ?
Respecting the chronology of my first chapter, I happen to from it to my second proposition. The one that interests the set of the governments. To manage a country, in my opinion, it is before all to manage a big family. Does one have really need of so much " spécialists" ?
The État first of all. One could call this association : "France future" ! A President, elected by the set of the citizens, to the universal suffrage that we know well. The President's office, being situated lawfully in the capital. Around him, four vice - présidents tops: one loaded of the political business and the inside, the second of health and work, the third of the setting of life (culture, sport, habitat etc.), and the fourth of everything that concerns the finances (inclusive departmental associations).
Where that can become believable, it is that to complete this reduced team, one would name a vice-president in every department. He also surrounded with a same number of collaborators, having identical functions to their Parisian counterparts. To the difference near that these departmental vice-presidents would be elected by the people. The indisputable advantage of this " decentralization " of the power, would be to have a man or a woman in a place that it knows well.
On the four collaborators in every department, the vice-president designates two that will have the functions of deputy and senator of them. One saves the cost of the election campaigns of the legislative and the senatorial thus. One kicks out the wagon of the useless the prefects and the "sub-prefects", who will be replaced advantageously in charge by one the collaborators of the politics and the inside. I know, I know some a hit that are going to see red while reading ça ! Let's be objective, as would say the photographer!
With the data processing, the communication is child's game. Is there a person only at a time it seems me, who can tap on the keyboard of an computer ? The vice-president's secretary charged for example of health and work, transmits in real time to all its other same departmental service colleagues, the information that she must communicate them.
By the slant of an association, the clarity of the numbers would impose itself of herself. Nothing that while suppressing all ministers and their bootlicker's cohorts, I am nearly certain that one would save at least more of ten millions of francs per month anything that in wage. This money would be injected then in the economy that would give itself a pleasure to grant a place to all staffs become useless. Them it is already, but one manages to let believe that they are utiles !
People sulk and protest to go to the urns currently ? It is normal since they don't feel concerned more in nothing. While knowing that it would be them and them only, that would decide the implantation of such factory. Of the construction of a school. Of a tracing of a railroad line. They would go at the urns two times per year with a pleasure and a total implication.
Why "judge" a crook having raged in a city, in Paris ? The laws therefore are not the same between the capital and the rest of the country ? Don't the judges, the magistrates and the juries have the same rules of deontology ? A business occurs, immediately it is judged.
So each vice-president takes the decision to forbid the access and the diffusion of a file in progress, its power will be respected locally. To the national echelon, with the flights that one knows, the integrity is excluded. At the same time as it is to the origin of the drifts that one deplores. The young "hooligans" makes themselves foam as shaving cream while seeing to pass to suckled it or in first page of the dailies, "the breaks that they made. The biggest contempt is the silence. Less one speaks of a business, less it keeps the attention, and more it loses its importance.
A man of land, the soil chosen by "its" people to it, on "its" territory, will have hundred times more of credibility and efficiency, that a " parachuted " ! Every region has its specificities. It is impossible all to know. It is necessary to know how to breathe them, as one delights itself while feeling the perfume of a flower. Every "country" in the France country, is an islet to the multiple colors. To try to impose him one of it, the same for all, comes back to kill the soul of our old.
If I made allusion in a little while to the old, it is for a very simple reason. Third proposition : Let's let to our valiant white heads, the care to assume that that the nervous life stops us from making today ; I want to say, to assure the education of the more young !
They have experience a lot, wisdom, the patience, and over it all, of the love to resell ! To valorize the old, it be also return them the homage that they deserve. The hours of glory of the commemorations would probably have a more solemn impact, if the rest of the time they were respected and non were ridiculed.
Rather than to lose a beneficial energy to solve pseudo problems of immigration, with the "political resumptions" to which we attend, finally adjust the inequalities towards our old. Enough bla-bla and of ointment in the back. Without counting that to the intellectual level, the children would risk to find their account there also well.
One deplores one level cultural deplorable ? To whom the mistake ? To the creators do who by thousand remain in the shade, due to a lack of sensible to be? To all these unknown artists of genius, because they don't have a sufficient piston to expose their works ? I could not write these pages on the future, without leaning me on these hiatuses. Because of the " seizure " on the art in general, that these are bestowed a handful of sharks, due to a lack of supports or influential relations, it is impossible to reach the big public.
Fourth proposition : I always remain in my "governmental" configuration as me described it. Fine arts, the film or theatrical, musical schools, of dance, of mine or God knows what again, are very expensive. The middle worker could never write down there its children. What is a discrimination : only the rich can offer to their offspring the possibility to invest in the sociocultural lap. What is not really in more, a pledge of values !
An association would be in charge of all artistic disciplines. The office should be composed of a representative of each of them and would act as jury. Every family whatever it is, would pay for a yearly lump sum to the aforesaid association. And that, for all children that it would like to write down there. Leaving from there, the things would be very simple. Do I want to write down my child to the painting ? I take appointment with the representative of the pictorial art sitting to the association. My child undergoes the tests of assessment. Then, it is oriented such school circa. It is there that the turns become subtle and encouraging. Because my child won't pay nothing at all. The material, the profs of this school, will be financed by the parental contributions.
By the slant of this multidisciplinary associative action, and of the total exemption from payment of the practicums, formations, trainings or other, one could find in this deep mass the true artistic, authentic, and non antiquated values. More need of the "hot grayish-brown" to assure the discovered talent everlastingness. The association would take the exhibitions sales, the official receptions, organized to promote the geniuses of tomorrow, in charge. The profits would be distributed by half between the association and the artist. Until there, it doesn't cost a circle to the government !
The easy money, the wealthiness and the free fame, are not compatible with the indispensable fundamental values to become a real acrobat. The modesty, the humility, the fairness, is the only supports on which one should bend to give back to the cultural world its letters of nobility. What would put a term by the same opportunity, to this ascension toward the more and more irrational summits concerning advertisement. A good product doesn't need advertisement. I am convinced of this adage. It is necessary to make so that the "vedettariat" in general, doesn't act anymore as support to these sharks starved of glory.
In the lineage of my fourth proposition, one could assimilate sport there in its whole. Following the same criterias and the same principles of detection and framing. To allow a child to practice soccer, then horsemanship or the fencing, before discovering that it is gifted in oar, how it is it possible currently ? What are the families to the incomes more that modest, who can write down their children in several clubs sportifs ? The adherences, the facilities, the displacements... All it costs true fortunes. By the slant of the association, it would be from the domain of the possible and either of the surrealism !
I know pertinently that what I write is illusory. Yet, if I refer some to what makes itself for Europe, it would not hold to not much to elaborate a world statute! Why consider not a referendum by the inhabitants of the whole planet? So for once, the peoples had right to the speech? Sarcasms, the causticity probably in my subjects, translate in truth a scream of the heart. I believe in the peace on the earth. The future, it is it for me !
The important to my eyes, is to rationalize every component of the society. The some have all, the other nothing. The fairness is quickly tracée ! The money spoils all, I think to have been clear on this point while expressing the bottom of my thought fairly. Unemployment, the inequalities to all levels, make aggravate the social crises only.
Fifth proposition : Let's take the students. Most conflicts emanate minority small groups, that spoil a collective to its basis. First point : to forbid with strength and determination all encrustation or creation of political movements in the surrounding walls of the faculties or universities. "You are not content ? ... Make your suitcase and let the place to a young that wants to work and not to make some bosses" ! Second point : not to transform the student environment in platform antinational. "You have age to make your military draft, you make it a point that is all or then you clear " ! How many pseudo students "rempilent" after their ferry in the only goal to escape the liabilities civic ? The dispensations should be abolished to this level. Third point : to target with more required studies according to the real needs of the society. " I make medicine because at least I am going to be able to make me of the money without bursting me the ass" !
It is true that most these "budding geniuses", are descended of comfortable families. In this case, the stock market should be suppressed. They would be reverted to the humble and modest, that are excluded due to a lack of means. There the association could overrule the values again, and could orient by affinity and real vocation, rather than by piston.
It would be therefore indispensable to curb the obstructions for the professions say "intellectual", to the profit of those more modest and distinctly more indispensable.
These excesses succeed ineluctably to saturation, with regard to the offers of jobs. It will be the object of my sixth proposition. The unemployment ! Burning topic if him in est ! Why did one arrive là of it? I gave seems me him, some elements of answer to this questioning, during my narration. The fiscal pressures, the excessive loads, the overconsumption has other points etc. probably, more insidious but just as perverse. First point : the allowances and indemnities. Second point : the balance between the offer and the demand. Third point : the bonuses poured to the boss for the enrollment. By the slant of an association and its vice-president (I hold on to the ideas), the three parameters could be managed with realism.
Let's see the first point concerning the assignment of the allowances or the indemnities to the unemployed person. Already, I would grant no remittance to a young that would not justify an au less, one year of activity at a patron : apprentice, boy of shopping, washers of windows, whatever that would attest its desire to integrate to the society. Coming out of their mother's skirts, they botch their studies to boast "to feel" the sorrel of the État !
I pursue. Between twenty and twenty-five years, after the obligatory period to help them to fit in good conditions I would grant them three months of indemnities naturally. In full strength of age, an use is found quickly. Between twenty-five and thirty, six months. Between thirty and thirty-five ten months, and until forty a complete year. Beyond forty, between two and four years next one the parental conditions.
One finances oil-bearing research more comfortably, rather than those aiming to get energies of substitution. One places the rod of the very high genetics, to the detriment of the elementary prevention. One strives to cultivate the art to make fructify the money, before the one to win it. One develops the illusion to choke the realism.
Besides, unemployment is an inexhaustible source of profits for some privileged. The punctures that are done very regularly on the allowances, are they reverted elsewhere ? Would not they go rather, in the pockets of some high placed ? Simple question. Thanks to these deliberate and kept gaps between the offer and the demand, the schemings can last without pain!
Under all governments, it is the same refrain : to help the boss and to encourage them. Helps to the enrollment& Lightening of taxes& You speak of a stupidity. After having cashed the bonuses, they dismiss beautiful besides! "I hire three peeled, I benefit from helps, and one year after me in madmen ten to the door " ! Conjuncture economic oblige ! Then to limit these excesses, it would be necessary to put the things to the clean. The enrollment should make itself for a length of ten years minimum ; otherwise, it is at once the versed bonus repayment, more of the indemnities equivalent to the unemployed person.
Instead of the early cans and obsolete, a lightening or a pure and simple exoneration of the loads would be of much better omen. Like what, my previous proposition to this topic is not as stupid in "second reading". More the boss will be able to manage its enterprise, and no to turn into machine to coins for the different administrations or banks, more it will be able to value its real needs without being baited by the carrots that one makes him sparkle by the bonuses.
Seventh proposition : That it is in agglomeration or on the roads and freeways, the behavior of the drivers became more and more catastrophic. Everybody moans, revolt and rebel. What does himself make him of concrete to limit such abus ? Nothing very sensible. It is there that I arrive with my proposition. One takes the oldest to the youngest, in to decreasing other therefore, among the claimants of employment. All of the less those that want to work. After a small theoretical and convenient practicum in an unit of state police, they would be capable to know the rudimentary laws concerning code of the road. Without being "sworn " for as much, they would benefit from a way of value recognition concerning law. Hunt would be open.
By group of two or three, according to the places to control, us valiant second-hand policemen would wage to battle without thank you to the users in infringement. Parking on the sidewalks. In double or triple line. Conducted dangerous. No respect of the signals of the code of the road. No respect of the pedestrians in the crosswalks. Excess of speed. On the whole, everything that makes the driver today, an assassin in power. What is it that could really make our policemen without uniforme ? Wait... Let me finish at least ! Very simple. They raise the number of the contravening and transmit them to the police to which they are connected. Is it the denouncement this gentleman ? My ass it is the chicken ? Since it is impossible to count on the public-spiritedness of some peppery of the wheel, it is not anymore the denouncement ; but of the protection !
Photo to the support so necessary, the guilty recognized driver would see himself inflicting a fine of which he would remember a long time ! When I speak of fine, it would be necessary that it is masterly. There is not another solution I believe, to learn again to this stayed a minimum of public-spiritedness. Don't they pay for their tickets at the end of a week ? Six months of withdrawal of authorized !
Does route It kills how many innocents every year ? The suppleness, the understanding, the forgiveness and tolerance, didn't have any reducing effect on the number of accidents. Then it would be necessary to use the big means. It would be an unique opportunity to reduce the number of claimants of employment. Without it doesn't cost anything to the collectivities in more. I explain myself. All work deserves salary. What means that the unemployed person would be paid on the fines, that they would have permitted to cash .
Who didn't ever scream an anger because it could not reach a sidewalk because of a flipping car who forbade the accès of it? Without speaking of concerts of klaxons ! To length of day one hears the resonant warnings to show their owner's impatience. Why ? Because a feeble let drag " its car in double line and stopped it from leaving. I am not a partisan of the blind and free violence. I extol tolerance, the love and the forgiveness to length of day. Facing extreme situations as the one of which I have just made state, there are not any other means. For éradiquer an epidemic, it is not with words that it is necessary to inject the antidote.
To conclude my seventh proposition, concerning the mad of the wheel, that would be not to give the driver's license solely if the person justifies a place of parking. That makes itself in other countries I believe, as Japan. It would agree to be attentive to the heaps of the cars! Not only of a hypocritical manner, on the one of the electoral mandates! I know several people who have at least two if it is not three personal vehicles. For only one place of very sensible garage! Where do they park their other jalopies?
You are undoubtedly, in the same frame of mind that me, with regard to the polls. Cans... Feeble... Rigged... Oriented... Demagogic... The qualifiers don't miss to show our virulent indignation, towards this incontournable as much as dangerous phenomenon of manipulation by excellence.
I take my previous examples of associations. In every department, a leading committee. Small divergence in relation to the other associations this time. Indeed, so that a poll reflects a current of thought objectively, it is indispensable to be going to look etc. for the information in all cities, villages, hamlets From where the local structure setting up. Of the antennas if you prefer, established in the least recesses. One establishes very precise objectives. A questionnaire elaborated by the claimant himself, and identical for all sounders. A group would be assigned to interrogate the young. Another the aged people.
A team would take care to collect the answers by people in the home. Another by the agriculturists. A last finally, by the active population. On five social levels, representative of the totality of the inhabitants, the poll would be done by a sample of one thousand people at least. If one takes the basis of ninety departments in France, at the rate of five thousand people probed in every department, it represents on the whole : four hundred fifty thousand people interrogated !... One is currently far from the two or three hundred, on sectors well définis ! As it is question to offer an use to people hired in these polls, the wages would be appropriated on the contracts established between the association and the claimant.
Let's take to precise example. The tracts in the mail boxes. Do interrogate people therefore as I have just proposed it, to know this that them in think ? The advertising agents would take some full the muzzle ! Before allowing them to "to invade" the mail boxes, the État should force them to this poll "size nature" ! What would make bring money already in the cases of the association. The contravening, because of the shrewd there will be some always, to compel them in case of flagrant offense, to sufficiently important fines to be dissuasive.
Knowledge so such product is efficient. So such thought is generating of hope. So such project deserves that it is deepened. What are the modifications to bring to such project of law. Once again, short the bowl of the ineptitudes to which we are confronted permanently. The stuffings of skull, the pipelines in all kinds, the manipulations, the misinformations.
What brings me naturally to the eighth proposition. The pollution ! On this point I think, everybody is okay. Before coming from it to the proposition in herself, of grace gentlemen the big of this world agonisant ; mercy even ! Stop culpabiliser the small as you make it. Do you think indeed that that are the housewives with their small "sprays" that are responsible for the destruction of the layer of ozone ? A little seriousness and of level-headedness in your sarcasms if it pleases you ! How much of millions of atomizers represents a plane to the takeoff ? How many billions of these same sprays, does a rocket bombard in the atmosphère ? Simple question in private conversation !
Has my proposition. One draws on the card of the city, a circle representing two kilometers of ray, around the town hall or a point situated at the center city. In this protected so-called zone, no inhabitant included in this "perimeter of dépollution" will have the right to circulate with its car. It should park her outside of this same zone. Says otherwise, if one pinches me to the wheel of my jalopy whereas I live in this controlled zone, I already pay for a strong fine, and I am the object of a warning. At second, one withdraws me my car for six mois ; I speak of car, not of permis !
Every inhabitant, recorded inside this protective perimeter, will receive a badge. In return for a yearly forfeit, to get this permanent pass, it would have the right to circulate free on all fashions of public transportation existants ; in the circle only very sensible ! The sum poured to the title of the yearly forfeit, being destined to compensate the companies of transportation. It would also be able to, according to past agreements with the companies of taxicabs, to get a free transportation per week to surrender for example to an urgent appointment. The rest of the time, always with the taxicabs, it would have right to proportional discounts to its remoteness of the center city. If the race, that can reach four kilometers in all on the diameter of the circle, it would be forty percent of discount ; two kilometers, twenty percent etc. Either ten percent to the kilometer.
It is for it that one could already modify some rules. For example, to proscribe the stop of the cars energetically on the sidewalks ? To embark those, parked to the angles of these last. At once, it would be the pound and a dissuasive fine. To arrange protected spaces all fifty meters to let free the access to the sidewalks ; two thick ferries to flowers spaced of one meter, would allow disabled and people aged to circulate freely without exposing itself to the dangers of the pavement.
One would also be able to, since one is thrown in the good intentions, to regulate a more drastic manner the deliveries. Instead of letting the enormous chests clutter the pavements during long hours; they work the poor, I know, and they cannot make otherwise. Them no, but the powers public yes ! For example, to create a general center of distribution on the outskirts of the perimeters protected ? A warehouse toward which all goods would be directed. They would be routed then by small pickups on the places where they must succeed. This principle would have a triple favors. Of one, him would clear centers it city. Of two, it would be generating of emploies ! Of three, it would allow the road carriers of more to lose a lot of money with time lost by their drivers to unload their trucks. Who says won time, does say money saved no? Therefore, it means that the carriers should fulfill a royalties by the society of distribution, that could be self-financed. The respect of the human value would be by the same opportunity took in account.
Of the hours of tire, of solitude, of irritation also, reduced to nothing. One night to the hotel, expenses of restaurant... One understands sudden reason better, the road transportation prices become alarming. Whereas while having the possibility to go to a simple place of access, it could even take a rest while letting the employees of the society be in charge of the packets to deliver. Who says society of transit, said unemployed person of course in less ! As to how many employees creating about ten stations by unit of transit, financed by the societies and the manufacturers, us could succeed in sinking in the utopie ? Let's take the ninety departments. Every region, possess to the minimum a good twenty agglomerations susceptible to be interested by this project. What would make while counting a society by city, created two hundred stations. On the set of the territory, after a scholarly calculation, it would carry to eighteen one thousand the number of unemployed person in less ! If I add with the employees to the polls, one arrives nevertheless to close to five hundred thousand people employees !
Since I am some to speak of the transportation, I cannot keep under silence the idea that came me about the manufacturers. It will also be the conclusion of this eighth proposition. As each knows it, the goal searched for by all boss, is to win a maximum of money. Nothing of culpabilisant moreover, considering the fact that all work deserves salary.
Take an example all simple : champagne. Who doesn't from time to time like, to offer itself a bottle of this precious nectar ? On present hour it became a real luxury for the three quarters of the population. If I was a wine-grower, I would try to base my calculations in a different manner. A bottle, relate about five francs of bénéfit ; I ignore the numbers, and I say whatever about their case, but it is merely to support my proposition. I keep my five francs therefore in reference. I sell every year say one thousand bottles ; that, without making thick calculations, let me a clean margin of five thousand francs. I decide to try a shot of poker then. I reduce half the price of my bottles.
What is going to give me two francs fifty only of profit. Yes but ! ... Instead of selling one thousand bottles, I sell more than ten milles of them! Morality, instead of five thousand bullets of profits, I pocket twenty of them besides one thousand. I don't stop here this revealing example. I interest the government in it. As we know it all, these are the loads that ruin the economy. Also, to encourage and to promote this new way to make, the state should participate a concrete manner. Does the boss want to lower of twenty percent its tariffs ? The taxes would lower to equal proportion. Do I reduce thirty percent the set of my prices to the consommation ? The state immediately deducts thirty percent of my employers' loads, and so forth.
To throw back the economy will never make itself, while plugging a breach on one hand to open one of the other of it. It would be time that each takes conscience of the weight of its own mistakes or exaggerations, and submits to the reason. The logic is not always bearer of enthusiasm and fame. Between to burst hunger and to go without from some non-essential to throw back the machine, people would know how to choose. Whereas one stops thinking, to act, to decide in the name of a people, merely to put forward themselves. More that in any domain, it would be good to know itself the opinion of the French.
You see well that exist some solutions. I am not the only God thank you, to possess a fertile imagination. So instead of choking people, the big tried to consult them to all levels, tomorrow I am sure of it, the insoluble " problems " would find a solution currently. Provided that all one each puts its own there!
What drives me naturally to the ninth and last proposition. Why nine ? Doesn't the new number represent the altruism, the etc. devotion? Besides, in numerology, it embodies the end of a cycle therefore, the beginning of something again... of new ! Doesn't the era of the Aquarius mean the one of the renewal and the changement ?
To change, as I already specified it, it is not necessary to be content with displacing. You take an idiot for example. A sower of shit by excellence. It does panic in a service. You can that is true, to make gift of it to another service ! A good process exchange. The idiot will always remain an idiot. The problem won't be put of for as much. The solution consists in kicking out this branleur merely and simplement ! There, one is ridded some.
To arrive to this radical solution, the only one that can be potentially bearer of renewal, it would agree to modify our own manners to be. To say amen to all, to accept while resigning itself, nothing to say by fear to be punished, is not what it is suited to call the good method. The harmony, of the low to the summit of the pyramid that composes the society, won't be able to be considered that so each element that composes it plays its role. In a hive, if the anarchy was to the picture of the present society, do you think that we could savor the delights offered by the nature ? The honey, by definition, embodies the symbiosis of all strengths implied in its development well.
Doesn't have hireling ", not more that it has superior minds there. There is the chain from end to end, a mutual respect of the some in relation to the other. The all generates a harmony, and each to its place, contribute to the development of the honey. If the society can be compared to this hive, what taste can really have the honey that it fabrique ? Everybody pulls itself in the paws... It is the more gets by that takes itself of it... Easy to bawl when that doesn't go, while being incapable to say that that goes so by chance, the things improve. I know that what I proposed is a puerile sprig. I know especially as so together, the peoples tried to find the means to modify the established structures, there would be that is sure of the notorious changes. Once again the violence, the hate and the desire all to break don't serve to anything.
It is not in formantant a revolution to reverse the states, that one will be able to build an equitable universe serenely. The dialogue, the dialogue, the lucidity and the determination are distinctly valorizing assets. History is there to remind it to us. The strokes of states, the reversings, only drive to the chaos and to the tearing. Through my propositions, I tried to see what could permit a bootjack of solution if the case arises. Because it is not either while remaining the two feet in the same clog, that one will be able to hope to come out of the crisis.
I respect the institutions, the discipline, and the values acquired. I have the right to express my disagreement. It is not in my opinion, while " titillating " a little the leaders, that I am going to make them an arm of honor in the seeing ; or to murder "them by abject words deprived of logic. Not to confound truth of the heart and mind of malevolence, it is the the whole nuance that it agrees to bring to my narration. It is the difference that I make between a good unionist and a sower of shit. Between a good politician and a fascist puppet. Between a good banker and a shark speculator. Between a good journalist and a searches messes up. Between a true boss and a larva to the service of the power. Between a religious truth and a hypocrite. Between a pure and authentic acrobat and a remote-controlled stooge. To finish, between a man worthy of this name, and a photocopy disguised in to be human !
A country, a Nation, belongs to all those and those that stay there. It is that that one calls I believe, a collectivity ; a people too ! I keep to the bottom of the heart a family's picture, it is more beautiful and more representative of fairness. I speak of future, therefore I dream... Don't begin to inflate me with your smiles snide ! This immense family, like all those that we compose in our respective homes, has need of a structure. To the instar of all couples or the man governs a despotic or authoritative manner, the family "Nation" undergoes the same annoyances.
If one consults the conjoined solely to extract him of the money or while soliciting a favor, one has little luck to be taken seriously in our declarations of love ! Especially if the rest of the time, it doesn't have another solution that to submit to the dogmas that us him let's impose ! The governments it is the same difference. There is some that look for the compromises, of others that impose dictatorships, and thickest majority that tries to maintain the ship to streams somehow. To my knowledge, in any country to the world possibilities offered the people to express themselves don't exist. The people "playing" for the circumstance the role of the conjoined forsaken.
So that a couple lives in harmony, happy and interdependent, a complementarity is necessary. Each of the conjoined bringing its values and its qualities that he puts spontaneously to the service of the other. One cannot be good in all, even less perfect. The shortcomings of one are the qualities of the other ; the osmosis is reached. The respect of the individual then. It is a crucial and major point. A couple is strong, so each member can enjoy its personality at every instant. "Me first you after", it is not in my opinion what makes itself of better to express the harmony ! But some people like that !
Since it is impossible to phone a president or a minister, without passing by a multitude of "services", that there are at least a governmental delegate in every city or village capable to transmit the ideas, suggestions, or doléances of people of the base ? A way of "box to ideas" humaine ! Hold ! ... Does one speak of humanity ?
Keep a pain or a pain on the heart it is not good. Because it entails the rancor and muteness. To be content with taking in choir the slogans politicized of those that are there to exploit our weakness, not okay either. It is necessary to find the happy medium, but without making compromise. I like the people who tell me shit in face ! At least I know to what to hold of it to me. On the other hand, I hate the false asses that never know on what foot to dance: "Ah well you understand... would I well like, but I believe that I am not able to, you knows" ?... That is to say that they are ready to help you, but before, they want to be sure that it is not going to hire them besides mesure ! Hey well, to the risk to displease you, I consider that at the moment we are all in the second category! "One would like well that that changes... but one doesn't make anything for there to arrive" ! Real weather vanes, we orient our thoughts toward the one that will shout the strongest and will hold the most beautiful promises.
To want butter and the money of butter, driven to the demagogy and the selfishness. All for me nothing for the neighbor, and it becomes the anarchy. Let's come back one instant to the human body. Let's do imagine that all organs want to benefit permanently from a potential maximum of energy ; Does that happen? A whorehouse organized, a shambles without name, an indescribable mess and naturally, the illnesses assured ! As in the hive, every organ, every device, has its function that is clean to him. The all, created the harmony, therefore, the balance and the health ! Do you complain about to be sick within the society ? Accept the differences, tolerate and admit the divergences of view, satisfy yourselves of the role that you have to play, without wanting to hold those of the others ! While learning to live for oneself, tensions reduce. The jealousy disappears. The desire to appear is annihilated.
As the place to air to be good, I believe well that I am going to try to make me elect some part ! Because the future is assured again for very numerous years to these women and these men. Who, after having understood that they could not make anything, are arranged themselves to the shade of the ideas of the most maggoty. "Do you have an idea ? ... then a good advice closes your muzzle"! On the whole it is of this style ! It is finally easy the job of politics. You pretend to listen to people, and you make that you want ! Do notice, what difference is there between a leader who works and an other?
To all good to choose, I prefer and from afar to hear a minister to say with franchise : "One is in the shit and for a tip of time", that these ineptitudes as ludicrous that they are illusory. The drama, it is that to come precisely out of the shit, it is necessary to make something else that to let itself rock by nonsense and the "free promises". Once again, it is not while winning ten francs, that one can hope to spend fifty of them. To come back to realities more pragmatic and judicious, is in my opinion the only possibility to leave the rut. It is not the business of the policies and even less the one of the unions. It is ours, and to us only, oh well beloved peoples, to take the good direction and to make the good choices. To cover its dignity before all thing... For me, it means to be able to decide according to the events, without depending on no one. To affirm itself solidly as individual and either in disguised dish-cloth in personality, on which everybody wipes itself the feet. To live for oneself and no for the neighbors.
To be content with what life offers us without trying to require some more. To stop watching in the "mirrors", its past life, and to take advantage fully of what the present brings us. To look at people as they are and either through the pictures that our mental imposes us. More to envy the some and to despise the other. To know how to recognize its mistakes without culpabiliser of the innocents. To know how to offer a little its time to rescue a no one that is in the need. etc. I know. (It makes conceited, but it especially recalls me a song of regretted it Jean Gabin) ! Him also, " savait" !... It knew especially as one never knows nothing ! As it was right. Do I know, did I say, do I irritate you with my lessons of think - vous morals? Too bad. Or so much the better for me. Because at least it proves that I am in the truth with my history.
I understood that the wheel turns, that come happiness and the well - be after the suffering and misery. I also understood that more the things make us desire and are desirable, less we get them. I understood that while letting make the things, they come true of herselves ; what must happen occurs in any case. I understood that while letting me guide by the current of my life, without anticipating on nothing, I could savor the subtleties of the present that had escaped me up to here. I understood that the conseilleurs, disguised in false friends, was only swindlers. I understood that while accepting my condition without making pass me for another character, I became more authentic.
I understood especially as honor doesn't have a price and that for all the gold of the world, ever, no one the achètera ! I understood that more I became myself, more I lived in harmony. I understood to finish, that as having understood all it, I was in right to have a feeling legitimate of happiness. Happiness doesn't have a price. Because my heart is ready to like well more that it didn't ever before make it. The altruism, the devotion, doesn't have an intrinsic value, that if they address to all and all. No segregation, not of dismissal, not of judgment even less of contempt with regard to the other. Whatever they are. There are not any mean or kind people. There are the opportunists and the naive solely. A pity that the naive are so numerous and so little efficient, in relation to the dominant minority.
More the days pass, more the desire to fight reduces in the mind of those and those that, exhausted, collapse around us. The promiscuity is such, in this artificial universe, that the vital space becomes tiny. The atmosphere confines itself, pollute himself, is become unbreathable. Are we to the present, at the past or already demain ? The borders of the time and the space are themselves strictly definite, by those that have the privilege to consider itself as superior beings. Are they it indeed ? To our eyes only. Thanks to the appearances of which they knew how to don itself, they drove us where one is at the moment.
Tomorrow it is again away ? "Say nothing about you and rame"! ... The ocean the uncertainty, the desolation and the bitterness is immense. It is necessary to row all our strengths so that finally, we left this boat pierced to rest us on our island. This island, won't be a mirror the larks'... Nor a place of idleness. It will be authentic, pure and healthy. The love, tolerance, the fraternity, will be the unique banners of it. Don't panic I am in full delirium ! Pictures to the iridescent colors parade on my screen. I see the people laughter, to have fun and to take advantage fully of this amply deserved rest. I see (decidedly I am going to open a cabinet), the countries to become of simple departments. I see the most cynical aberrations burning on all places of churches.
I finally see the word humanity shining all its fires sacred ! Alas, while opening the eyes on the present, that it is that do you see ? The future that one prepares us with hypocrisy. Again more of sufferings and restrictions. Of the more and more insular liberties. Of the gaps more and more marked between the big and the small. There I also see. I see the future of this future again more dark and inaccessible. To less que ? ... The answer us appartient ! The future therefore, sum up in a word for me : UNKNOWED ! ! ! The past ? You know what I think some. Remain the present ! Then since I finished some with my small journey through the times, I am going to write the thin word, since it appears that himself made !
LINES:
Artistic passion * Discovery of the Grant * Future Passes - Present * the Blind Woman and the Black child * the Price of the coils * Memories of Practicum * Novels to come * 9 Propositions extracted PPA from *